King Erasmus forced me to write about this article that I get a kick of.
How crappy is our police force (you know, I looked for another word other than "crappy" to describe them, but nothing else cut it... they can be craptacular at the best of times), but I digress.... As I was saying, how crappy is our police force, US and Canada alike (most likely other parts of the world as well), that they do such a despicable thing as this...
A man, Ricky, with his family in tow, was pulled over for a routine seatbelt violation when the officer ran his license and found an unpaid traffic ticket as a secondary offense, but as The Denver Channel notes, "the fact is, he had [paid the ticket] and the computer got it wrong". Ricky was told that his wife, Mercedes, would have to drive instead.
While Mercedes, aka Mercy, nursed her baby, the copper ran her license, then headed back to the car.
What ensued is reprehensible.
Without an explanation, the nursing baby was taken from its mother's bossom as she was handcuffed and thrown against the car with her blouse undone. All the while, her children were in the backseat of the car watching and crying as the bad man arrested her. When asked why she was being arrested, the officer merely replied, "you need to be silent".
And, according to Rocky Mountain News
"Even after Mercy Archuleta told the trooper she had been a victim of identity theft several years ago, he refused to let her go, saying there was a warrant for her arrest in a domestic-violence case in Lakewood."
Mercy was then stripped-searched and booked at the Jefferson County jail, even though she was found not to have any of the tattoos and scars that the suspect had. One officer admitted that she knew Mercy wasn't the suspect in question, but when Mercy asked if they could call someone and release her, the officer said, "Nope, I can't do that".
And the story gets better...
Apparently, a detective on the case of the tattooed suspect made a significant error when Mercy's name was shown on the crime computer, which happened to be an alias for the real suspect, Phyllis Rivera, by issuing a warrant for Mercy's name instead.
(I'm sorry, I have to interject here, all I hear when I read that part about the crime computer is the Batman change-of-scene music: da nananananananana)
The detective never attempted to locate Mercy to ensure that she was not the actual suspect. And worse yet, the detective never pulled a photo of either women to verify identity.
The Denver Channel states, "The Lakewood officer involved has been reprimanded, but not suspended".
So, what does this mean? After such behaviour, the cop can get paid and stay on the job, but isn't allowed any coffee or donut breaks?
Folks, I'm afraid I have to agree with King Erasmus on this one. That family had better sue with all their might. Well, within reason. Yes, the police officer did his job, but he didn't give the woman a chance to button up. Yes, they knowingly strip-searched and booked an innocent person. Yes, it was embarrassing, but necessary to hold her until it got sorted out, so perhaps the family should only get a little compensation for that act. But, the major crime of the police department was in the lousy detective work. It brings shame onto a section of criminology that I admire to some degree. Yes, I hope there is some form of compensation other than a mere apology for this family. I hope they get some money.
I guess I've just got to hope for Mercy.
The following articles have trackbacked this article:
Asshole of the Month Award [by dave's not here | David Earney]
Digg This! • Add to del.icio.us • Email this