Gay Marriage: Why Not? Why?
With the changing times comes more differences of opinion. If people are becoming more comfortable with homosexuality, then why not allow them to marry like heterosexual couples? Are they just allowed to screw, but not be happily together?
Okay, let's be honest, if heteros have to be miserable for the rest of their lives being with only one partner, then why can't we submit homosexuals to the same torture? For the good of future generations? Please! Heteros are messing up this world fine on their own, but hey, why not invite a few more to this party.
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns






















Comments
Samatha, you wrote "If people are becoming more comfortable with homosexuality". Just who are those 'people', besides the homosexuals themselves who are doing the marriage promotion? And how about all of those people that are not comfortable with homosexuality. Let's see there is several billion Christians, all Moslems and .. Does there views count for anything.
During time not so distance, homesexuals were almost universally identified as 'queers'. Queer marriages. Doesn't quite have the same ring as gay marriages, does it?
Posted by: docdave | August 9, 2005 11:42 AM
This guy above is great. Call it queer marriage, call it dyke nuptuals. call it whatever, still the fact remains that I love my partner and want to spend the rest of my life with her and be able to provide and care for her like any other spouse would.
Posted by: Danielle | August 12, 2005 01:49 PM
Add The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns to your favourites, which is filled with frequently updated whitty rants, opinions, news and humour. You'll love it; I guarantee!
Consider it done
Posted by: Dan Kauffman | August 12, 2005 02:37 PM
Civil marriage is the recognition and promotion of the fundamental basis of human society... the nuclear family. Marriage has meant the joining of the sexes to create a family since before recorded history. Now, gays want to co-opt marriage as part of the gay agenda to demand approval from society at large.
I don't have a problem if two people of the same sex want to enter into a contractual agreement that has the same rights and benefits that are conferred by marriage, but don't call it marriage because it isn't. A rose is a rose, call it what you will... and a skunk won't smell like a rose even if you call it a rose. By the very definition of the word, two people of the same sex CANNOT be married just as a pig cannot be a bird.
The difference here is between tolerance and approval. In a free society we are obligated to tolerate behavior that we may find offensive as long as it doesn't injure us. However, in a free society no one has the right to demand that we approve of something we find objectionable. To do otherwise takes away our freedom to believe as we desire.
Recently, in Canada two men who aren't gay have applied for a marriage permit in order to obtain the benefits. Shouldn't this be legal? How about a brother and sister marrying? If the brother and sister don't want children, then why can't they be married? After all, every claim that can be made for gay marriage can be made for incestual marriage.
This is all part of the post-modern "anything goes" attack on traditional culture. The reason that Western civilization has chosen monogamous heterosexual marriage as the ultimate interpersonal relationship is because it reduces friction between individuals in society and it offers the best chance to raise future generations of well-adjusted humans.
Posted by: JohnClif | August 15, 2005 01:11 PM
oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhh she is so gay she cheated on my mother beeeeeeep brother
Posted by: samntha smith | December 12, 2007 06:51 PM
oooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhh she is so gay she cheated on my mother beeeeeeep brother
Posted by: samntha smith | December 12, 2007 06:51 PM
she looks like an animal or a bug that came from under a rock. cangrats on the pregnancy.no one messes with buster or rhymes.
Posted by: buster and rhimes | December 12, 2007 07:02 PM
she looks like an animal or a bug that came from under a rock. cangrats on the pregnancy.no one messes with buster or rhymes.
Posted by: buster and rhimes | December 12, 2007 07:03 PM