Thoughts On The Blogosphere
Many people take the blogging environment a little to serious for their own good. They are the ones who call you on your "facts" as if you are supposed to maintain some sort of journalistic integrity.
Well, guess what, this blogger has none.
Like most bloggers, I am writing for the sake of getting out my ramblings, and hopefully getting a few laughs and making a few bucks in support of my entertainment. And, like most bloggers, I did not take any journalism courses, so I do not follow the standard practises of the field.
I have no desire to do so.
I don't, by any means, claim to have outstanding blog etiquette and have little interest in researching whether my words and interpretations of information are ipso facto. I do try to make sure my information isn't too far off its mark, but I can't guarantee precision.
Those who take this s**t too seriously, should lighten up a little, take a pill, chill, enjoy life a little more, and quit nitpicking minute details because it's not getting you anywhere in life.
You're just annoying.
But, if annoying is your intent, then irritate away. You'll just be looked upon by other bloggers as banal, irksome, and tedious, and they'll end up skipping your site as a result.
You do realise that your daft commentary does nothing more than give one heartburn, and an eventual ulcer, right? What are you trying to prove anyhow? Commonplace, that's what all them numbskulls are, commonplace.
I'm sure there are bloggers out there that enjoy getting comments and hatemail from annoying idiots, though. And, I admire those who relish the imbecilic ramblings because those bloggers have a noodle on their heads to dish out some deserving reprisals. Although I prefer, for the most part, to let idiocy slide, I appreciate reading from those bloggers out there who dish out the pain on unsuspecting halfwits.
Give it to them good for the sake of all us bloggers!
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns






















Comments
Oh, gosh, well said, m'am.
Posted by: Mr.D.
|
September 28, 2005 04:27 AM
Hiya Samantha.
I'm not sure but I get referrals from your site quite a bit and just happened to check in this morning.
I routinely post the e-mails and extended comments of the people that send me hate mail. I don't get why people who tell me that my posts don't affect them still feel the need to post long tambling e-mails about how I affected them.
Perhaps I'm part of the problem, but whatever.
Posted by: Penda | September 28, 2005 06:27 AM
I don't have any sort of journalistic integrity in my blog whatsoever... It's just down 'n' dirty and out of control (much like me)! I would welcome some hate mail though, god knows I have enough posts to warrant some. It'd be fun!
So far the only person who's tried to mess with me is Cricket, the annoying talking doll from the 80's... I put her in her place pretty quickly and she waved the White flag! It was a fun battle!
Posted by: Lingo Slinger | September 28, 2005 07:21 AM
Haven't attracted the half - wits who need to prove they are right and I'm ont. Count myself lucky. Trying to engage em in some sort of debate is an exercise in futility and deleting the comments may only infuriate the half - wits.
Posted by: Rich | September 28, 2005 08:42 AM
I just laugh my arse off when I get a troll on my site that will insult my education level, my intelligence, and my motives for saying what I say. I always found it humorous that someone that suppoedly thinks I'm "stupid and uneducated" would feel compelled to take time out of their day to argue with a retard like myself. After tearing them a new one, I point this out and they never come back to my blog.
Posted by: moonbat monitor | September 28, 2005 08:50 AM
Penda,
You are on the blogroll so do expect to see some referals from time to time :)
Nah, you aren't part of the problem. What Sam is refering to is the idiot whom just get no end to pleasure from trolling at the details of an article while ignoring the bigger message - as if she should actually care or be expected to get every detail right all of the time. I'm not talking about "fun" nit-picking, but those whom actually take this stuff all to seriously and are trying to annoy.
Sam gets a kick out of those, like you, whom nail these idiots for what they are...
Posted by: MrBig | September 28, 2005 09:01 AM
Yep - I'm in the middle of a battle right now. It's fun, as I get to take out all of my pent up aggression on idiots instead of, you know, getting fired.
Thanks for the link. I'll return the favor, since I like it here.
Posted by: Penda | September 28, 2005 09:29 AM
I'm still trying to figure out how to get blacklisted so I can join in all the fun! I even posted that amusing quiz/map that declared I am a flaming LIBERAL. Sigh. Keep up the good work! 8)
Posted by: Georganna Hancock | September 28, 2005 09:48 AM
You got it. I wrote a blog piece on that photo of Pres. Bush saying he needed a toilet break. And some busybody criticized me for not reporting on all the other stuff the U.N. did that day. Huh? I'm not a reporter, I told him. It's not my job to write about anything except whatever the hell I want.
Posted by: the mad hare | September 28, 2005 10:35 AM
You get email from your readers? How in the world do you do that?
I've been blogging for two years. I've managed to crawl my way to Marauding Marsupial on the TTLB, and I almost NEVER get email, or even comments.....
What is your secret? You MUST tell me!
PUHLEASSSSSSEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!
LOL
:-)
Posted by: David Earney
|
September 28, 2005 11:33 AM
The secret is to not care and post stories about people who die in confoundingly stupid ways. I posted a story about a guy to fired into a crowd of people, supposedly to break up a fight, and was rhen shot by cops because he refused to put his gun down. He was a former lottery winner, and fingured being rich would make him bulletproof. I got a few hate-mails about that.
Then there was the woman who's last words were "Look what I can still do" as she did a handstand off her second floor hotel balcomy. A few mails from that too.
You have to really piss people off to get some good mail. I seem to do that pretty well.
Posted by: Penda | September 28, 2005 12:29 PM
Hmm... I write some of my posts in a serious vein and with those it's useful to get corrections if I'm wrong on facts or missing relevant information. I like for blogging to be something of a conversation, and some of the conversations are not just fun but also good for changing my mind.
Posted by: PG | September 28, 2005 12:48 PM
Anythign can be a topic of conversation as long as both parties are willing to convers about it, instead of calling the blogger immature, disgusting, and sick, which is usually the case on my Blog.
Posted by: Penda | September 28, 2005 01:16 PM
Well said.
Posted by: Troy Worman | September 28, 2005 02:34 PM
Does this mean I cannot say anything crude and irresponsible about the nickel post?
Posted by: abrasivist | September 28, 2005 05:23 PM
Before I was married my last name was Lawrence and when you initialized my first and middle name I became D.J. Lawrence- so close yet so far- LMAO You know me Sam, I write about whatever blows my dress up ;)
Posted by: Diane | September 28, 2005 07:52 PM
You're wrong. Blogging is ONLY for educated journalists. Close this puppy down now!
LOL just kidding.
Posted by: mel | September 28, 2005 08:07 PM
Ulcers are caused by bacteria, not stress. =)
P. S. Who doesn't love hatemail?
P. P. S. Thanks for the "random" link.
Posted by: D. J. | September 28, 2005 11:34 PM
trolling at the details of an article while ignoring the bigger message
Augh I hate that, those smug people always coming up with red herrings. I've noticed a lot of times this is what the more "polite" people who think they're better/smarter than me like to do. I don't argue with anyone anymore over the internet.
I don't get hatemail. I don't know whether to be happy or jealous.
Posted by: PlutosDad
|
September 29, 2005 10:27 AM