*Sniff* *Sniff* Mmmmm...
Some perverted sicko (at least that's my opinion of it) allegedly decided to pleasure himself in the "Junior Miss" section of a Rogersville Goody's store.
Apparently, a female customer saw the man in his self-serve sex act and phoned the police. When the police caught the guy, he stated that he didn't know he had been seen and he didn't know he was in the "Junior Miss" section. He thought he was in the women's section.
It seems the guy went into the store for that purpose and that purpose only. He was not there to shop, according to the report.
He was arrested for indecent exposure, and apparently, this was not his first time diddling with his woohoo..
Just for your information, men, this is NOT a way to occupy your time while your partner shops for clothes.
I sure like how he claims he thought he was in the women's section and not the kids' section. Like that's SO much better.
You know, the least he could have done was buy something after he jerked off to the store's products.
Nutjob.
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns






















Comments
diddling with his woohoo..
Bwahhaahaa!
Nutjob.
Bwahahaa!!
Posted by: von | January 31, 2006 04:40 AM
Back when I was night crew chief of a supermarket, I got called into the security room by the plainclothes security guy late one night. On the screen was a man in the pantyhose/cosmetics aisle, looking around and pacing back and forth. Sure enough, after about five minutes, he got up close to the product and began flogging his bishop (going a mile a minute). We called the po-po.
The guy was hauled out a few minutes later, crying. The videotape, I understand, was used as evidence. Not quite the "Pamela and Tommy Lee" video.
Posted by: Dave D | January 31, 2006 05:18 AM
"I sure like how he claims he thought he was in the women's section and not the kids' section. Like that's SO much better."
In most jurisdictions that's the difference between misdemenour indecent exposure and
felony sexual battery upon a minor.
BIG difference, not that I believe he did not know where he was.
Posted by: Dan Kauffman | January 31, 2006 06:20 AM
As your previous commenter stated, knowing where he was could be the difference in the level of the charge. Whether he knew what section he was in or not is argueable.
My 35 year old wife buys her clothes in the junior Miss section. I didn't realize that until a couple of weeks ago when I had to go with her and some friends to buy clothes, Her friends where upset she could buy from that section. It was at that point I realized there was a difference.
Posted by: Contagion | January 31, 2006 08:02 AM
I'm sure he learned a valuable lesson from this... I just can't think of it.
Posted by: ben | January 31, 2006 08:57 AM
I don't know if it's a difference between men and women or US and Canada, or me and you, but I was thinking more along the lines of "like that's SO much better" in a moral sense rather than a legal sense.
But, I get your point too.
Posted by: Sam | January 31, 2006 09:09 AM
Perhaps he had already been to the cosmetics counter and bought some lotion...
Heheheh...
Posted by: That 1 Guy | January 31, 2006 10:06 AM
... this is NOT a way to occupy your time while your partner shops for clothes.
Like this guy has a partner! LOL!
{shakin'head}
Posted by: MBains
|
January 31, 2006 10:42 AM
well, i guess there will be a by-election now.
Posted by: rwmcbean | January 31, 2006 11:27 AM
I'd think he's trying to reduce the severity of his charges by claiming he was lost. But if you look at little kids clothing these days, you'd have a hard time distinguishing it from tramp clothing of yesteryear. The things some parents dress little girls in these days, is down right horrible in some cases. I'm not one for blaming clothes for how someone is treated, but I do think a person is treated how they look sometimes. Sometimes how someone looks is an accurate reflection of how they think about themselves, and other times it isn't. It's just not doing girls any favours though by encouraging them to show their belly button every day in Maraih Carey like clothing.
Posted by: Saskboy | February 1, 2006 12:19 PM