Moron Revealed #41

First off, my apologies to both What the hell is wrong with you? and Yippee-ki-yay! as I put up a second hint when it wasn't necessary.
Ward Churchill was already guessed correctly by What the hell is wrong with you? the day before, but I was in la-la land (not literally) and didn't see the guess (what the hell is wrong with me, is definitely fitting here, lol).
So, Yippee-ki-yay! deserves an honourable mention for knowing without a doubt that Ward Churchill is bonkers, but What the hell is wrong with you? is the winner this time around, which means that von has been given the boot for now.
Lol.
Of course, many of you may remember Ward Churchill for his controversial 9/11 ramblings in which he referred to the victims of the Twin Towers as "little Eichmanns". This reference to the orchestrator of the Holocaust implied that the 9/11 deceased had created their own catastrophe, and in that sense, deserved what they got.
Yes, he's one sick mofo.
He's even admits to vandalism as a form of bravado against repression when he blurts:
Not being comfortable with that, I have a rule of thumb: I smile very politely to the cop, take the ticket, look to see how much the fine is going to be, and before I leave that state, I make sure I cause at least that much property damage in state material before I go, so it’s a wash, boys and girls.Oh sure, I, myself, will speed all I want, but I'm aware that I live in a democratic society that agrees to build these rules as a society; therefore, if I'm to deserve a role as a member of this society, then I take the ticket and pay the thing. I don't pull a childish hissy fit and take up more criminal actions.
Why do you choose to live in a country you're so strongly against?
That's my question to all hissy fit throwers.
As for blaming technocratic USA for the outcome, listen loser, the US put food on your table, clothes on your back, and gave you a d*mn job (which you didn't deserve in the first place, faker), not to mention enabled you to write you filth paper in the first place (with, you know, all those capitalistic resources: pen, paper, computer, etc.).
It also protects your a$$ as best it can from terrorism ever happening to you (although, why it should is beyond me).
Churchill spews more bologna in the paper called "Some People Push Back" On the Justice of Roosting Chickens by claiming that
The FBI and "cooperating agencies" can be thus relied upon to set about "protecting freedom" by destroying whatever rights and liberties were left to U.S. citizens before September 11.But, apparently, we need to remind this douche that as much as he disses US freedom, it is this very freedom that enabled him to write and speak out against it - all without fear of being beaten to a bloody pulp, which he so seemingly deserves.
The s-o-b should be thanking his lucky stars that he wasn't living in Iraq and badmouthing Saddam's administration instead because we all know Saddam would have taken pleasure in torturing and killing such an insolent creep.
I suppose my only solace is that moron Churchill was fired from his professorship at the University of Colorado as a result of his treasonous paper and for falsifying his social status as having a Ph.D. (which he does not), being an original painter (which he pretty much only replicates famous paintings), and being of aboriginal blood (claimed he was part Indian, or First Nations when it's suggested he is not).
It seems Ward Churchill is the Imaginary Indian of the US.
Or, perhaps a wannabe Grey Owl of anarchy.
(side note: he claims his native name is Kenis, which clearly sounds a lot like something else, so I choose to take liberties and simply refer to this guy as a dick!)
But, you know, all those at the U of C (or CU, or whatever they choose to call themselves) who were involved in the hiring of this... weasel... should be fired, too.
And, for those who haven't read the paper itself, Churchill's underlying theory is his claim that the 9/11 terrorists only did what they did as a retaliatory measure after many of their children died as a result of the 1991 US bombing of their country's water and sewage system.
Weasel Ward - you've got to be dreaming if you think the murderers on those planes were doing it for the sake of the children. The terrorists don't give a rat's a$$ about life, and you know that, especially when you see them strapping a suicide bomb onto some poor tyke, under 12 years of age no less.
So, whatever, fool.
Those terrorists, in my opinion, did it because they were jealous cowards. No, the "cowards" are not the
"firm-jawed lads" who delighted in flying stealth aircraft through the undefended airspace of Baghdadas you put it. The cowards are the terrorists who were jealous of the US's wealth, power, freedom, and sense of morality.
And, as a result, they behaved as any chicken-hearted, jealous s-o-b does: they threw a tantrum. They didn't want to see fair and just treatment (democracy) enter civilian life in their own countries. They wanted to continue ruling their countries with a bomb-clad fist, so they attempted to take the US down a peg.
Well, guess what, the US didn't sink down to their level, and it's not sinking down to yours either, Churchill.
Hiding behind a piece of paper - calling heroes cowards - has got to be one of the largest acts of cowardice out there - you know, aside from being an actual terrorist.
But, thinking about it, instead of publicising your paper, you probably should have kept it within the classroom where you likely had a better chance of brainwashing the more naive, liberalistic/anarchistic rebels of the US who were 'still finding themselves'.
I'm sure you had a lot of ignorant suckers willing to hear, and buy into, your pathetic propaganda in there rather than out here in the real world where the more seasoned and logically-thinking wander (well, some of us, anyhow).
And, yes, I was a university student (graduated with 2 degrees and on Dean's List), so I am aware of the level of naïveté involved amongst colleagues.
You know, I hope you all appreciate this article because to write it, I was forced to read (sleep) through Churchill's name-dropping, cliche-oozing, wannabe-trendsetting, weak terminology-spewing drivel of a paper.
How many naps I had to take just to get through that abomination, I don't know.
And, in reflection, the term "moron" just doesn't seem to cut it for this guy. Got a better term we could use for him?
Have at it.
I'm done here. Congratulations again to What the hell is wrong with you? for the win.
More on the moron:
WARD CHURCHILL RIDES AGAIN telling a joke that likely only he finds funny.
Ward Churchillbacks fragging: Controversial '9-11 prof' suggests rolling grenades under line officers
Is 9-11 prof a plagiarist? Churchill writings said to contain passages 'almost identical' to those of other authors
Ward Churchill- Another Leftist Allowed Promote Sedition and Treason
WARD CHURCHILL: CAUGHT ON TAPE ADVOCATING TERRORISM
Ward Churchill: wikiquotes
Pirate Ballerina - for all your Ward Churchill needs, or to wretch a little when you find out some people want the moron "un"fired.
Some open trackbacks: partyblog.ca, imaginekitty, The Dumb Ox, Conservative Cat, Woman Honor Thyself, Comedian Jenee
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns






















Comments
DAMMIT. I was totally going to guess him but I thought "no way, too obvious, she won't use him."
You fooled me. Even when I'm right I suck at this game. ;)
Posted by: JimK
|
July 21, 2006 02:41 AM
You're secretly a winner JimK, think of it that way.
Posted by: Sam | July 21, 2006 03:19 AM
It wasn't until the second hint with the emphasis on "fake" that I realized it might be a guy despite the long hair. Heh.
Posted by: McGehee
|
July 21, 2006 04:57 AM
He's DEFINITELY not Eva Longoria.
Posted by: Dave D | July 21, 2006 05:15 AM