The Crazy Rants of Samantha BurnsFantasy
If you missed it, The Ten O'Clock Scholar explained male fantasies a bit for us in a previous article commentary regarding a man on man photoshop job, and I was just wondering if other guys concur with this notion.
Though speaking as a man, I don't think women fantasize about man-on-man action; I think the photoshopper was just having fun turning the tables on the standard male fantasy of girl/girl.But, can anyone explain my 5 guys with me fantasy?Now, you might ask, what's up with that? The simple answer is it's the next stage of voyeurism: seeing not just naked women, but people having sex! Making them both female however avoids having to see some hairy dude, and protects the viewer from any accusations of latent male homosexuality.
While I'm at it, I'll also explain the "twins" fetish for ya! Of course, if one woman is good, two are better -- double everything! Hence the standard "I want two women" fantasy. But, one woman is complicated, so two are even harder to understand and relate to. What to do? Aha! Twins! It's ONE woman, with TWO bodies! Problem solved!
The icky fact that they are really sisters is mentally suppressed; they are simply thought of as a single entity.
See how the male mind works?
You're probably sorry now! :-)
;-D
Comments
5 guys? Sorry, that's beyond my capacity to explain -- you're on your own with that one! ;)
Posted by: RDS | August 31, 2006 05:53 PM
I'm not at all prepared for the concept of one woman with two bodies.
Then again, DC Comics is, or at least was. One of the minor members of the Legion of Superheroes was Triplicate Girl, who could be in three places at once - until one of her bodies was killed in action (no, not that kind of action) and the name no longer fit. (She was renamed Duo Damsel, which is probably why she's been forgotten by now.)
Posted by: CGHill | August 31, 2006 07:00 PM
Never saw the twins appeal myself, I don't even see the appeal of completely symetrical boobs. If I went to the trouble of getting two chicks, I want two different chicks.
Posted by: Dave Munger | August 31, 2006 07:02 PM
Which five guys?
Posted by: Dave D | August 31, 2006 07:24 PM
I think your unexplicable fantasy with five guys is like my unexplicable fantasy with a Woman with four arms, although I'm sad with the fact that mine is far more improvable than yours.
Posted by: Nukes and Candy | August 31, 2006 09:02 PM
But, one woman is complicated, so two are even harder to understand and relate to
The Chinese ideogram for Trouble
is the Ideogram for House with 2 ideograms for woman inside it. ;-)
Posted by: Dan Kauffman![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.samanthaburns.com/nav-commenters.gif)
|
August 31, 2006 10:26 PM
Does it really matter which 5? I don't know of any guys who would want to be a part of my harem of men.
There may be a little room on that list for a Dave D, though. lol.
Bring me my ranch-dressing hose!
Posted by: Sam | September 1, 2006 12:08 AM
I read in an old Psychology Today that that's a pretty common one for women (incredibly easy to set up if you really wanted to do it too, just become a porn star or something). Apparently, men mostly fantasize about stuff we'd do if we could talk women into it, and women fantasize about stuff they wouldn't really do (really, what's to stop a woman from doing ANYTHING that could possibly occur to her, except restraint on her part?. The most common fantasy type for women is the faceless stranger, either taking control in such a way that although it's not rape, the woman still isn't responsible for humping a stranger, or in a group that she's in complete control of, like they're begging you or something.
Also, a lot of people seem to be into stuff they saw on TV as kids, like vampires and four-armed women. I can't wait to see what arouses people thirty years from now (think jarring internet imagery).
Posted by: Dave Munger | September 1, 2006 04:00 PM