Sexual Harrassment... 4 Year Old
You know society's taken a turn for the worse when you read this bit of news: 4 -year-old Accused of Improperly Touching Teacher.
Thanks goes to Committees of Correspondence for sending this story my way.
A four-year-old hugged his teachers aide and was put into in-school suspension, according to the father. But La Vega school administrators have a different story.The parent, for good reason, fought to get the accusation off the child's record and for the aide to apologise for the accusation.Damarcus Blackwell's four-year-old son was lining-up to get on the bus after school last month, when he was accused of rubbing his face in the chest of a female employee.
The prinicipal of La Vega Primary School sent a letter to the Blackwells that said the pre-kindergartener demonstrated "inappropriate physical behavior interpreted as sexual contact and/or sexual harassment."
Unfortunately, the administration refuses to follow Blackwell's request:
Blackwell got a response from the La Vega administration. The sexual references on the discipline referral were removed. But the thing that makes Blackwell most upset is they told him "your request for an apology by the aide and removal of all paperwork regarding this incident is denied." Now the young student's file will refer to the incident as "inappropriate physical contact." And Blackwell says he will continue to fight the district.Nice.
Does this mean I can file a report on the 7 year old here for grabbing my boobs on occasion?
Seriously, people, it's called "curiosity".
CU-RI-OS-I-TY
... not sexual harrassment!
The only thing children are doing is exploring the world around them to learn about it, and it is our job as adults to teach them what they can and cannot do - WE DON'T REPORT THEM; WE TEACH THEM!
Boys don't have boobs - they are curious and want to know what those things are.
A 4 year old IS NOT a sexual predator!
F*cking stupid liberalistic PC bullsh*t is all it is.
As Committees of Correspondence questioned, "maybe Liberals will breed themselves out of the gene pool?"
And, I want to know when this political correctness garbage will peak and go on the decline. I'm getting sick of it.
The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns






















Comments
Worst case scenerio, the kid was wiping his nose on her and her chest just happened to be where his face was at the time.
Posted by: DragonLady | December 15, 2006 10:23 AM
"And, I want to know when this political correctness garbage will peak and go on the decline. I'm getting sick of it."
I think it just peaked...I mean, where do we go from here? I think they should charge those dolphins who attempt to have a little fun with female swimmers with RAPE. Dolphins are supposed to be highly intelligent, so they are very well aware of what they're doing. Also, it's only the males that do this so it's yet another example of the PATRIARCHY in action!
Posted by: Wahrheit
|
December 15, 2006 03:17 PM
Actually Political Correctness in some areas has taken a Great Circle route to exist side by side with it's Polar Opposite.
But when you get right down to it, do not all philosophys which have as their basis the control of individual behavior have a commonality?
Muslim cleric's remarks stir outrage
Senior Australian Muslim cleric Sheikh Taj Aldin al-Hilali triggered widespread outrage for likening women who don't wear head scarfs to meat left out for prey to eat, a comment one official says encourages rape. (RICK RYCROFT/Associated Press)
SYDNEY, Australia -- Australia's most prominent Islamic cleric said Thursday he wouldn't resign from his post, amid widespread outrage over his description of women who don't wear head scarfs as "uncovered meat" who invite rape
Western Muslims' Racist Rape Spree
In Australia's New South Wales Supreme Court in December 2005, a visiting Pakistani rapist testified that his victims had no right to say no, because they were not wearing a headscarf.
And earlier this year Australians were outraged when Lebanese Sheik Faiz Mohammed gave a lecture in Sydney where he informed his audience that rape victims had no one to blame but themselves. Women, he said, who wore skimpy clothing, invited men to rape them.
A few months earlier, in Copenhagen, Islamic mufti and scholar, Shahid Mehdi created uproar when – like his peer in Australia – he stated that women who did not wear a headscarf were asking to be raped.
And with haunting synchronicity in 2004, the London Telegraph reported that visiting Egyptian scholar Sheik Yusaf al-Qaradawi claimed female rape victims should be punished if they were dressed immodestly when they were raped. He added, “For her to be absolved from guilt, a raped woman must have shown good conduct.”
Oslo Professor of Anthropology, Unni Wikan, said Norwegian women must take responsibility for the fact that Muslim men find their manner of dress provocative. And since these men believe women are responsible for rape, she stated, the women must adapt to the multicultural society around them.
So is there any real difference on this issue from a Far Left Socialist like Unni Wikan and a Medieval Fanatic Imam?
You know, if that little boy had been a member of the correct religion the womnan would have been charged instead of him.
Posted by: Dan Kauffman | December 15, 2006 05:29 PM
I'm certain Dan Kaufman did not mean to equate rape by a grown man to a 4-year old boy's innocent curiosity (or over-exuberant hug or snotty nose wipe)...
I must have misread his intentions in his comment.
Posted by: TheWriteJerry | December 16, 2006 08:20 AM